BLOG—THOUGHTS ON ABSTRACTION

Beyond the Canvas: Improvisational Painting and the Art of Engaging a Complex World

Improvisational abstract painting, when done right, should defy the artist’s expectations. Each stroke, shape, and smudge becomes part of an unfolding dialogue, creating a space where the act of painting is less about achieving a final image and more about exploring possibilities. This openness to the unknown transforms the canvas into a dynamic environment where every decision leads to new challenges and discoveries. In an era defined by acceleration and increasing complexity and interconnectedness, the process of improvisational painting offers insights into how we might think about approaching the unpredictable landscapes of social, political, and ecological life with a similar spirit of engagement and adaptability.

In this essay, we will explore ideas about form, aesthetics, process, and resonance—concepts drawn from thinkers such as Caroline Levine, Timothy Morton, Alfred North Whitehead, and Hartmut Rosa—revealing how the practice of improvisational painting can extend beyond the canvas. Through this lens, ideas used in any improvisational endeavor can be seen as employing the mindset needed for engaging with uncertainty and ambiguity in the broader social, political, and ecological complexities of our time.



Form as Flexible Structures


In improvisational abstract painting, “form” is not a fixed shape or prescribed structure but a flexible element guiding the artist through an evolving process. Drawing from literary critic Caroline Levine’s concept of forms as recurring patterns that shape both art and social life, each mark or gesture acts as a form that influences and, at times, challenges the artist’s process. As each form interacts with others on the canvas, it can introduce friction or disrupt the artist’s intentions, requiring a shift in approach. This ongoing interaction mirrors the way social and political structures shape human engagement, often demanding creative adaptation to navigate inherent limitations and unexpected barriers.


In society, according to Levine, forms such as hierarchies, networks, and institutions create frameworks for human relationships but also introduce constraints that require resilience and creative responses. Like an artist adjusting to the changes in a painting’s composition, individuals and communities interact within these structures by improvising, challenging norms, and reimagining possibilities. This relationship between form and flexibility highlights how navigating structures involves a degree of friction and recalibration that ultimately strengthens our collective experience.


Ecologically, too, we encounter forms that organize life while being influenced by cycles of adaptation and recovery. Just as a painting’s composition evolves through trial and experimentation, nature’s forms—such as ecosystems or species interactions—are shaped by ongoing processes of balance and renewal. This understanding of form in both art and nature encourages us to engage with these systems in ways that embrace tension and adaptability, recognizing that each challenge is part of a larger, resilient whole.



Aesthetic Experience


Improvisational abstract painting creates an aesthetic space that moves beyond the confines of classical representation, inviting an experience that is “felt” rather than logically explained. Engaging with this type of painting isn’t always straightforward; it often requires the artist to navigate choices that may clash or contradict each other, sometimes even forcing them to rethink or restart sections of the work. Improvisational abstract painting draws viewers into a space where each element lives on its own terms, not tied to a specific meaning but open to interpretation. This flexibility fosters an aesthetic experience rich in ambiguity, where surprise and tension are welcomed, rather than a harmonious whole where everything resolves neatly. Such openness extends beyond individual interpretation, encouraging collective engagement that values diverse experiences and multiple perspectives.


Ecological philosopher Timothy Morton views aesthetics as a way of perceiving that goes far beyond conventional ideas of beauty or taste. Instead, he describes it as a deep, immersive form of experiencing and relating to the world, attuning us to the relationships and interconnections between human and non-human entities. For Morton, aesthetics is about a heightened awareness of these links and of the agency of non-human elements, challenging us to look beyond human-centered perspectives.


In Morton’s philosophy, aesthetics is essential to understanding his concept of “hyperobjects”—immense phenomena like climate change or the biosphere that exist beyond full human understanding. Through aesthetics, we can begin to “feel” the presence of these vast, interconnected forces, even if we cannot fully comprehend them. Engaging with aesthetics allows us to recognize the interconnectedness of all things and reminds us of our deep entanglement with the world, rather than seeing ourselves as separate from it.


Aesthetics inherently embraces ambiguity and uncertainty. By engaging with art or nature through an aesthetic lens, we encounter a world that is often disorienting and hard to grasp fully. Instead of seeking clear boundaries or straightforward explanations, aesthetics opens up a space for embracing complexity and mystery, fostering a sense of curiosity, humility, and connection with the vast and intricate systems of our world.



Painting as an Act of Becoming


Improvisational abstract painting is a process of transformation, even transmutation, where the final piece is an outcome shaped by countless adjustments, discoveries, and failures. In line with Alfred North Whitehead’s process philosophy, which views reality as a flow of “becoming” rather than static “being,” this art form highlights creation as an unfolding process, with each brushstroke contributing to an evolving whole. Often, the artist encounters moments of tension or unanticipated results that disrupt their process, prompting them to adapt and rethink their approach. This willingness to embrace change and work through obstacles creates a dynamic that is as essential to the final piece.


This responsive and adaptive process-oriented approach mirrors the incremental, sometimes turbulent nature of social and political transformation, where progress is rarely linear or without setbacks. Cultural movements are shaped by responses to obstacles and shifting conditions, evolving in unexpected ways.


Similarly, ecological systems develop through cycles of growth, collapse, and adaptation where resilience is cultivated through change. By embracing improvisation, we learn that transformation is a continuous process of becoming, where each new turn adds richness and depth to a larger whole.



Resonance and Responsive Art-Making


The painter is seeking a dynamic, reciprocal relationship with their canvas; a resonance. Unlike harmony, resonance here does not imply smoothness or agreement; rather, it embraces the tension, struggle, and even conflict as part of meaningful connection. Resonance is about being open to transformation, where we respond to the world and allow it to “speak back,” fostering an ongoing, lively engagement rather than passive alignment or stability. Each gesture, color, or shape may challenge the painter’s intentions and the viewer’s expectations, requiring adaptation and a willingness to reshape the direction and the experience of the work.


The German sociologist Hartmut Rosa takes the idea of resonance and extends it to how we interact within social systems, where true engagement involves rapport as much as moments of discomfort and change. In social contexts, resonance invites us to work through differences and opposing viewpoints, creating connections that deepen precisely because they include friction. Within ecological systems, resonance can mean tuning into the feedback nature provides, which sometimes contradicts human expectations or plans, encouraging us to adapt our actions accordingly. Resonance, in this sense, is about responsiveness, valuing the unpredictable and relational rather than seeking controlled outcomes.



A Collective Tapestry of Individual Actions


Things rarely go according to plan. For instance, a painters improvised stroke may upend the balance of the piece or lead to failure. Rather than forcing the work back onto a fixed path, the artist, if paying attention, allows these moments to shape the outcome. This approach echoes the need for a flexibility and responsiveness when engaging our social and ecological landscapes, where challenges often arise unexpectedly, and predetermined solutions can fall short. Our relationships call for a mindset that values discovery over control. Each obstacle becomes an opportunity to engage more deeply, to explore new approaches that might not have been visible or even available at the outset. In both art and life, this way of thinking fosters interactions that are open, synergistic, and sensitive to the complexities of each situation.


Improvisational abstract painting shows us the value of working with unpredictability rather than resisting it. As the artist makes each mark, they encounter disruptions and unexpected directions that push them to rethink or adapt their approach. This process invites us to collaborate with uncertainty—rather than as something to be avoided or eliminated—as a natural part of making and understanding. Improvisational painting suggests that being comfortable with ambiguity allows us to explore our world more deeply and find unexpected connections without the need for perfect clarity or immediate resolution. This willingness to let go of rigid outcomes becomes the source of insight and growth.


These ideas—form as a flexible structure, process as an ongoing transformation, resonance as a responsive relationship, and aesthetics as an immersive engagement with the world—serve as guides for navigating interconnected relationships with a sense of curiosity and willingness to explore the unknown without avoiding friction or seeking only what is predictable. Just as an artist’s decisions reverberate across the canvas, our choices within social, political and ecological systems create lasting ripples, contributing to a collective tapestry of our individual actions, interactions, and responses that shape the broader landscape.